What the Old Stories Carry: Myth in Ocean Vuong's Night Sky with Exit Wounds | Ink & Ribbon Press
Close Reading

What the Old Stories Carry: Myth and Inheritance in Ocean Vuong's Night Sky with Exit Wounds

Ocean Vuong rewrites Telemachus, Odysseus, and Eurydice through war, displacement, and memory — and makes the case that classical myth only survives because every generation has the right to break it.

For nearly three millennia, Greek mythology has shaped Western literature through epic narratives of heroism, homecoming, and fate. These myths have endured because each generation finds new meaning in retelling them. In his debut poetry collection, Night Sky with Exit Wounds (2016), Ocean Vuong, a Vietnamese American poet whose writing is influenced by the Vietnam War, returns repeatedly to figures from The Odyssey, the myth of Orpheus and Eurydice, and the Greek ideology. Rather than preserving their traditional heroic ideals, Vuong reimagines these stories through the experiences of war, displacement, memory, and fractured inheritance. By rewriting myths in his poems, such as, “Telemachus,” “Odysseus Redux,” and, “Eurydice,” Vuong demonstrates that classical myths become even more powerful when they can give voice to histories and new identities that the original epics that originally emphasized more of a story arc rather than an emotional one.

Telemachus: A Father Who Never Returns

In “Telemachus,” Vuong completely inverts one of the defining reunions of Western literature. Vuong implies the question: What if Odysseus never made it home? Rather than reuniting with a living father, the poem opens with the speaker dragging a body from the sea, pulling it out by the hair the way, he says, any good son would. This reversal transforms a myth of heroic return into one of absence, replacing Homeric triumph with the lingering consequences of war. The memory of the Vietnam War influences Vuong’s poetry constantly. The stark act of violence is apparent, to drag someone by the hair signifies the relationship is one born out of resentment. Vuong recovers his history and explores the unknown memories of his father by recalling a famous tale. His use of enjambment a few lines later, where the speaker, afraid he might sink, asks the body if it knows who he is, addressing it as Ba, and never receiving an answer, creates two simultaneous questions: Do you know who I am, Father? and Do you know who I am? Father? The second reading destabilizes the father’s identity, implying that the speaker projects fatherhood onto an anonymous body, constructing a past he never possessed. This act of invention reflects Vuong’s own attempt to confront a father he scarcely knew, demonstrating how poetry can preserve histories that memory alone cannot. There is story truth, and a simultaneous, but different, emotional truth. Story truth tells the true events, but the emotional truth recalls the very real human feelings surrounding a universal emotional experience, something mythology helps recount. The poem’s closing lines, where the speaker describes a face that is not his own but one he will nonetheless wear to kiss every lover goodnight, complicate inheritance further. Rather than receiving his father’s face through blood, the speaker consciously chooses to wear it, suggesting identity has some agency in being formed from imagined histories. It also distances him from the father visually, indicating that this man and him are unrelated. The distinct movement from a father to a lover is unexpected and outlines the speaker’s understanding of intimacy and simultaneously home and heritage without reducing one to the other. By rewriting Telemachus’s reunion, Vuong transforms one of Western literature’s foundational myths into an exploration of memory’s inability, and necessity, to invent what has been lost, giving the story of Telemachus an emotional interpretation.

Odysseus Redux: The Hero Undone

If “Telemachus” imagines a father who never returns, “Odysseus Redux” reimagines the returning hero himself. In contrast to The Odyssey, Odysseus enters the poem as an intimate figure, stepping into the speaker’s room the way a shepherd might step directly out of a Caravaggio painting. The allusion to Caravaggio is significant. Renowned for his radical realism, Caravaggio rejected idealized figures in favor of ordinary people marked by imperfection and vulnerability. Likewise, Vuong strips Odysseus of his grandeur, leading the poem towards a private emotional experience. The poem traces an inward journey through memory and longing. Time stretches soon after as the speaker describes waiting for the night to wane into what feels like decades before he finally reaches for the other man’s hands. The delay becomes a journey, one measured through hesitation and emotional distance and memory rather than geography. Throughout Night Sky with Exit Wounds, Vuong repeatedly reconstructs the absent figure of the father, and here that absence lingers beneath the encounter. In fragmented memories and imagined relationships, the speaker searches for an understanding of himself through the presence, or absence, of another. The poem culminates in an image of a fallen petal caught on the other man’s tongue, which the speaker tries to remove, only to be stopped by the sight of his own face in a cracking mirror, the moment dissolving into crickets and scattered syllables. Again, the poem eases into romance, but restrained. The cracked mirror prevents the speaker from touching the figure before him, redirecting the encounter back onto himself. Rather than resolving identity, the poem fractures it, suggesting that the search for another inevitably became a search for the speaker’s memories. The speaker’s identity is undeniably tangled into his lovers, his memory, and his reconstruction of war and a lost father. The home has a meaning that is defined differently in memory than in the present. The ultimate resolution of The Odyssey is the home. What happens when the home is undefined? When the home is nothing but a blurry memory? These questions are explored by Vuong. By revising Odysseus’s homecoming as an intimate and psychological encounter, Vuong transforms the epic return into a reimagined father based on memory, self-recognition, and the home.

Vuong does not reject the classical tradition; he expands it and critiques it.

Eurydice: Rewriting the Turn

The ancient myth and love of Eurydice and Orpheus is legendary. Unable to trust that Eurydice is still following him, Orpheus turns, and she disappears forever. By titling the poem “Eurydice,” Vuong invites the reader to experience the myth from the perspective of the woman. Vuong presents two people who knowingly continue toward an inevitable ending, describing them, early in the poem, as seeing the loss coming and walking through the garden’s gap anyway. The emphasis is no longer on Orpheus’s glance but on Eurydice’s awareness that loss was always approaching. This outlines romance as well as grief. Two people continue loving despite knowing love is temporary, and the stakes become much higher through the use of mythology which only survives because of its universality. Vuong reinforces this idea through a repeated phrase built around perspective and standpoint, suggesting that truth itself changes depending on where you happen to be looking from. From Orpheus’s position, the story is about failure; from Eurydice’s, it becomes one of acceptance. Even identity proves unstable, as the speaker describes, later in the poem, a name changing the instant it’s touched by gravity. Love, grief, and time alter not only relationships but the identity of the people within them. The poem ends with the important realization that the speaker had it backward all along, mistaking love for the real and solid thing and the body for the imagined one, finalizing Eurydice’s, and the speaker’s realization that love is not real but the body real. The bitterness is understood tracing emotional intimacy. By allowing Eurydice’s perspective to reshape one of Greek mythology’s most familiar stories, Vuong masterfully demonstrates that myths endure because they can be retold and reimagined, exploring new meanings of original narratives.

Greek mythology has endured for thousands of years because its stories can endure reinterpretation. Before stories were written, they were told and reinterpreted by the speaker with each passing generation. In Night Sky with Exit Wounds, Ocean Vuong demonstrates his storytelling, showing that myths are capable of carrying new histories and new voices. Through Telemachus, Odysseus Redux, and Eurydice, he transforms narratives of heroic conquest into meditations on absence, grief, displacement, and survival. By placing refugees, absent fathers, queer love, and the lingering effects of war within the foundations of Western mythology, Vuong does not reject the classical tradition; he expands it and critiques it. In doing so, he reveals that mythology remains relevant precisely because every generation has the power to inherit, question, and ultimately rewrite the stories that shape its understanding of the world.

Avery Harris
About the author
Student & literary critic
Avery Harris is a student and literary critic whose close readings pay particular attention to form as a carrier of meaning. She writes in the Close Reading and Editorial sections of The Poetry Library.